6533b7dcfe1ef96bd12732a4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Search for a 2-quasiparticle high-Kisomer inRf256

D. PetersonJ. QianS. K. TandelS. K. TandelD. SeweryniakT. LauritsenPhilippos PapadakisC. N. DavidsK. HauschildA. Lopez-martensC. J. ListerJohn P. GreeneP. ChowdhuryT. L. KhooE. A. MccutchanR. V. F. JanssensG. D. JonesU. ShirwadkarXuan WangXuan WangI. AhmadI. StefanescuPaul GreenleesS. ZhuP. MarleySteffen KetelhutD. G. JenkinsM. AsaiM. P. CarpenterAndreas Martin HeinzAndreas Martin HeinzD. RostronF. G. KondevA P RobinsonA P RobinsonR.-d. HerzbergB. B. Back

subject

PhysicsNuclear reactionNuclear and High Energy Physicseducation.field_of_studyIsotope010308 nuclear & particles physicsFissionPopulationElementary particleFermion01 natural sciences0103 physical sciencesQuasiparticleAtomic physics010306 general physicsGround stateeducation

description

The energies of 2-quasiparticle (2-qp) states in heavy shell-stabilized nuclei provide information on the single-particle states that are responsible for the stability of superheavy nuclei. We have calculated the energies of 2-qp states in {sup 256}Rf, which suggest that a long-lived, low-energy 8{sup -} isomer should exist. A search was conducted for this isomer through a calorimetric conversion electron signal, sandwiched in time between implantation of a {sup 256}Rf nucleus and its fission decay, all within the same pixel of a double-sided Si strip detector. A 17(5)-{mu}s isomer was identified. However, its low population, {approx}5(2)% that of the ground state instead of the expected {approx}30%, suggests that it is more likely a 4-qp isomer. Possible reasons for the absence of an electromagnetic signature of a 2-qp isomer decay are discussed. These include the favored possibility that the isomer decays by fission, with a half-life indistinguishably close to that of the ground state. Another possibility, that there is no 2-qp isomer at all, would imply an abrupt termination of axially symmetric deformed shapes at Z=104, which describes nuclei with Z=92-103 very well.

https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.83.064311